The news that the energy-saving subsidy threshold was raised was officially confirmed. On September 5th, the Department of Economic Development of the Ministry of Finance revealed to the Director of Dihai that the threshold for subsidies for energy-efficient vehicles had been raised since October 1. To obtain a subsidy of 3,000 yuan, the average fuel consumption per 100 kilometers of vehicles would be reduced from the current 6.9 liters to 6.3. Rise. As soon as the news was disclosed, various doubts came in unexpectedly.

One of the most tangled arguments is that after the threshold has been raised, the most injurious is the self-owned brand model, as if the independent brand has lost the chance of getting a mixed subsidy. Although this is seen as a "pragmatic, realistic" argument, but also speak for their children, there is a suspicion of self-dwarf, for the growth of their own brand is only a disadvantage. Therefore, raising the threshold has nothing to do with the independent brand, do not have to attack this revised policy, but also no longer have to worry about their own brands.

In the opinion of the Ministry of Finance, energy-saving subsidies must both play an important role in expanding automobile consumption and an important measure to promote the structural adjustment of energy-saving vehicles. In the eyes of businesses, this is a great opportunity to expand sales, and in the eyes of consumers, subsidies for buying cars are certainly a good thing. To say so, it seems that everyone hopes that the energy-saving subsidies will not be tightened, and the result of Pratt & Whitney is the best.

In my opinion, the threshold for energy-saving subsidies should give companies the signal that they need to cross this threshold before they can be favored by consumers. In other words, companies need to improve their technology. But what is the current situation? Overnight, it seems that all models under 1.6L can be subsidized. Whether it is a joint venture or autonomy, there are even no shortage of famous fuel consumers. What is this indicating? There was a problem with the specification of the threshold, and the encouraged model was not encouraged.

Where are the problems caused by the low threshold? Obviously, money is used too fast. According to data from the Department of Economic Development of the Ministry of Finance, since the launch of energy-saving vehicle promotion in June 2010, it has been more than a year since the end of May 2011, and it has cumulatively supported and promoted 2.15 million 1.6-liter or lower energy-saving vehicles. The Ministry of Finance said that the effect is significant. In my opinion, the effect of “costing money like water” is significant, and it is not very significant to “encourage energy conservation”. Is it not angry that so many taxpayers' money should be spent on models that should not be encouraged? Moreover, the subsidy itself is controversial. Why do people who do not buy a car pay for the car? People who do not buy cars do not pursue this issue and are very tolerant.

Therefore, we have seen positive signs: the energy-saving subsidy threshold has been raised, and it may be possible to achieve the effect of the policy itself. Regardless of whether it is a self-owned or joint venture, if you want to use energy-saving subsidies to drive sales, you really improve your technology, don't try to fish in the water, and leave the benefits to the consumers who need it most.